Compliance with ISO 21434
Ensure compliance with the ISO 21434's validation and verification requirements using an AI-driven fuzz testing platform.
ISO 21434.
Compliance.
ISO 21434 revolutionizes automotive software security, introducing standardized language, minimum engineering requirements, and a collaborative culture.
Why comply with ISO/SAE 21434
Automotive software security
Automakers prioritize visible issues over application security. Short-term gains but long-term risks; ISO 21434 demands software security, signaling change.
Hacking a Jeep is surprisingly easy
Connectivity in modern vehicles exposes them to remote hacks. A 2015 incident with a Jeep Cherokee shows the grave risks - 1.4 million recalls, massive financial damage.
Be reliable and secure
Vulnerabilities in automotive software pose wide-reaching consequences. Swift digitization created an imbalance in software security, risking public safety. Proactive action is crucial.
Continental: Getting ISO 21434 compliant with fuzzing
Continental integrated instrumented fuzz testing into the development process and reached compliance with ISO/SAE 21434, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, UN R155, and ASPICE for cybersecurity. Watch the webinar to learn how Continental built an automated security testing process as part of scalable CI/CD infrastructure by applying fuzzing at the Software-in-the-Loop level (SiL).
Goals of ISO 21434.
- Creating a standardized terminology for software security within the automotive landscape
- Defining minimal requirements for software security engineering
- Improving collaboration within the automotive value chain
- Becoming the new security benchmark
- Incorporating security early on in the development lifecycle
- Establishing a security culture
3 steps that will help you to develop secure automotive software.
Foster a security culture.
Cultural acceptance is key for secure software. Automotive companies must cultivate a culture where everyone in the SDLC prioritizes security, supported by management and developers. Tooling, values, and practices must align.
Shift left.
Testing post-release is too late for automotive software security. “Shifting left” with early testing in the SDLC is crucial, outweighing late-stage bug fixes or recalls.
Use feedback-based fuzzing in automotive software.
Common automotive security tests (SAST, DAST) have drawbacks. Feedback-based fuzzing, like CI Fuzz, offers efficiency by automating and minimizing false positives, ideal for automotive software.
Build secure automotive software.
Automotive companies need to make software security a priority and implement appropriate security measures before it is too late. This will not only make our roads safer, but also save time, money, and nerves. DevSecOps and automotive fuzzing tools offer great solutions that manufacturers can implement to prevent crashes, and thus improve the efficiency and accuracy of their testing efforts while minimizing costs.
Ready to start your security journey?
Interested in fuzz testing? Book a call with us to learn more on how you can:
- Scale and automate your software testing without hardware dependencies.
- Detect critical bugs & vulnerabilities early in the development.
- Uncover only actual issues without false positives.
- Enable developers to reproduce & fix issues in minutes, not weeks.
- Ensure compliance with ISO 21434 testing requirements and ASPICE for cybersecurity.